Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 29.06.2025 07:56

Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Why would Joseph Smith say that polygamy was God's law?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Marvel vs. Capcom Fighting Collection June patch notes - EventHubs
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
If Sharks Don't Have Lungs Then What Are Their Nostrils Doing? - IFLScience
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Attenborough's Ocean a Brutal, Beautiful Wake-up Call - Newser
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What’s next?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Everything You Need to Know About MicroSD Express - WIRED
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Can red light therapy improve blood circulation?
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
David Hogg to depart as DNC vice chair after months of turmoil - The Washington Post